Gracie

Dr. Jart+ Cryo Rubber™ Soothing Face Mask with Allantoin vs Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment

Dr. Jart+ Cryo Rubber™ Soothing Face Mask with Allantoin scores 8.6/9.8 and Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment scores 8.7/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.

Head to head

Dr. Jart+ Cryo Rubber™ Soothing Face Mask with Allantoin
Dr. Jart+

Cryo Rubber™ Soothing Face Mask with Allantoin

maskmid-range
8.6
VS
Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment
Paula's Choice

Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment

serummid-range
8.7

Score comparison

These two are neck and neck — just 0.1 points apart.

3
2
Dr. Jart+ wins 0
Tied 3
Paula's Choice wins 2
8.6Dr. Jart+
vs
8.7Paula's Choice

Scores last verified: July 2026

Attribute battle

Hydration Efficacy

TIE
9.8
9.8
Dr. Jart+
Paula's Choice

Irritation Risk

TIE
9.5
9.5
Dr. Jart+
Paula's Choice

Active Ingredient Strength

Paula's Choice WINS
3.1
7.1
Dr. Jart+
Paula's Choice

Ingredient Transparency

Paula's Choice WINS
8.5
8.8
Dr. Jart+
Paula's Choice

Formulation Safety

TIE
9.0
9.0
Dr. Jart+
Paula's Choice

Why these two are neck and neck

These two serums take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.

Ingredient Transparency is another area of separation. Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment scores 8.8 here versus 8.5 for Dr. Jart+ Cryo Rubber™ Soothing Face Mask with Allantoin. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.

Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment brings Retinol, Tetrahexyldecyl Ascorbate, and Palmitoyl Oligopeptide as actives, while dr. Jart+ Cryo Rubber™ Soothing Face Mask with Allantoin relies on Acetyl Hexapeptide-8, Tocopherol, and Allantoin. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.

Best for your skin type

Dr. Jart+ Cryo Rubber™ Soothing Face Mask with Allantoin is better if you have

  • Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
  • Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Dipropylene Glycol
  • Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations

Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment is better if you have

  • Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
  • Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Glycerin
  • Targeting specific concerns like aging or uneven tone — Retinol does the heavy lifting

Value comparison

Both sit in the mid-range bracket, so value comes down to formulation quality. Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment gets the nod here with its 8.7 overall score — you're getting more for a similar outlay.

Our verdict

✶ Our verdict

It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.

8.6Dr. Jart+
vs
8.7Paula's Choice

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: Dr. Jart+ Cryo Rubber™ Soothing Face Mask with Allantoin or Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment?

Based on ingredient analysis, Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.

Do Dr. Jart+ Cryo Rubber™ Soothing Face Mask with Allantoin and Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment share ingredients?

Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.

What's the main difference between Dr. Jart+ Cryo Rubber™ Soothing Face Mask with Allantoin and Paula's Choice Clinical 1% Retinol Treatment?

The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.