Dr. Jart+ Cicapair ™ Tiger Grass Camo Drops Color Corrector SPF 35 vs Supergoop! Glowscreen Soft-Radiance Drops Mineral SPF 40
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair ™ Tiger Grass Camo Drops Color Corrector SPF 35 scores 9.0/9.8 vs Supergoop! Glowscreen Soft-Radiance Drops Mineral SPF 40 at 5.4/9.8. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair ™ Tiger Grass Camo Drops Color Corrector SPF 35 wins for active ingredients.
Head to head
Cicapair ™ Tiger Grass Camo Drops Color Corrector SPF 35
Glowscreen Soft-Radiance Drops Mineral SPF 40
Score comparison
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair ™ Tiger Grass Camo Drops Color Corrector SPF 35 takes this one, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: July 2026
Attribute battle
Hydration Efficacy
Dr. Jart+ WINSIrritation Risk
TIEActive Ingredient Strength
Dr. Jart+ WINSIngredient Transparency
Supergoop! WINSFormulation Safety
TIEIngredient face-off
9% overlapOnly in Dr. Jart+ Cicapair ™ Tiger Grass Camo Drops Color Corrector SPF 35
62 unique
Shared ingredients
6 in common
Only in Supergoop! Glowscreen Soft-Radiance Drops Mineral SPF 40
14 unique
Why Dr. Jart+ Cicapair ™ Tiger Grass Camo Drops Color Corrector SPF 35 comes out ahead
Where Dr. Jart+ Cicapair ™ Tiger Grass Camo Drops Color Corrector SPF 35 really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 9.2 compared to Supergoop! Glowscreen Soft-Radiance Drops Mineral SPF 40's 2.0. Its formula features Centella Asiatica Extract, Niacinamide, and Asiaticoside in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Dr. Jart+ Cicapair ™ Tiger Grass Camo Drops Color Corrector SPF 35 scores 9.8 here versus 5.2 for Supergoop! Glowscreen Soft-Radiance Drops Mineral SPF 40. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair ™ Tiger Grass Camo Drops Color Corrector SPF 35 brings Centella Asiatica Extract, Niacinamide, and Asiaticoside as actives, while supergoop! Glowscreen Soft-Radiance Drops Mineral SPF 40 relies on Gluconolactone. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Best for your skin type
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair ™ Tiger Grass Camo Drops Color Corrector SPF 35 is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Butylene Glycol
- Targeting specific concerns like aging or uneven tone — Centella Asiatica Extract does the heavy lifting
Supergoop! Glowscreen Soft-Radiance Drops Mineral SPF 40 is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations
Our verdict
Dr. Jart+ Cicapair ™ Tiger Grass Camo Drops Color Corrector SPF 35 wins this comparison with a meaningfully stronger ingredient profile and overall score.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: Dr. Jart+ Cicapair ™ Tiger Grass Camo Drops Color Corrector SPF 35 or Supergoop! Glowscreen Soft-Radiance Drops Mineral SPF 40?
Based on ingredient analysis, Dr. Jart+ Cicapair ™ Tiger Grass Camo Drops Color Corrector SPF 35 scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Do Dr. Jart+ Cicapair ™ Tiger Grass Camo Drops Color Corrector SPF 35 and Supergoop! Glowscreen Soft-Radiance Drops Mineral SPF 40 share ingredients?
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
What's the main difference between Dr. Jart+ Cicapair ™ Tiger Grass Camo Drops Color Corrector SPF 35 and Supergoop! Glowscreen Soft-Radiance Drops Mineral SPF 40?
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.