Dr. Jart+ Ceramidin Cream vs Su:m37 Time Energy Moisturizing Soft Cream
Dr. Jart+ Ceramidin Cream scores 8.6/9.8 vs Su:m37 Time Energy Moisturizing Soft Cream at 8.1/9.8. Dr. Jart+ Ceramidin Cream wins for hydration.
Loading...
Dr. Jart+ Ceramidin Cream scores 8.6/9.8 vs Su:m37 Time Energy Moisturizing Soft Cream at 8.1/9.8. Dr. Jart+ Ceramidin Cream wins for hydration.
Dr. Jart+ Ceramidin Cream edges ahead, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
14 unique
12 in common
15 unique
Where Dr. Jart+ Ceramidin Cream really shines is hydration efficacy, scoring 9.8 compared to Su:m37 Time Energy Moisturizing Soft Cream's 8.4. With Glycerin, Butylene Glycol, and Phytosphingosine in its top ingredients, Dr. Jart+ Ceramidin Cream delivers stronger moisture-binding capability.
Formulation Safety is another area of separation. Dr. Jart+ Ceramidin Cream scores 9.0 here versus 8.0 for Su:m37 Time Energy Moisturizing Soft Cream. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Dr. Jart+ Ceramidin Cream brings Ceramide Np, Ceramide Ap, and Ceramide Eop as actives, while su:m37 Time Energy Moisturizing Soft Cream relies on Bifida Ferment Lysate, Adenosine, and Niacinamide. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Dr. Jart+ Ceramidin Cream is better if you have
Su:m37 Time Energy Moisturizing Soft Cream is better if you have
At premium pricing with a score of 8.6, Dr. Jart+ Ceramidin Cream delivers strong value. Su:m37 Time Energy Moisturizing Soft Cream sits at the luxury level with a 8.1 score — the extra cost doesn't translate to better scores here.
Dr. Jart+ Ceramidin Cream edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but Su:m37 Time Energy Moisturizing Soft Cream is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, Dr. Jart+ Ceramidin Cream scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.