Dr. Jart+ Ceramidin Cream vs Peter Thomas Roth Water Drench Hyaluronic Cloud Cream
Dr. Jart+ Ceramidin Cream scores 8.6/9.8 vs Peter Thomas Roth Water Drench Hyaluronic Cloud Cream at 8.1/9.8. Dr. Jart+ Ceramidin Cream wins for active ingredients.
Loading...
Dr. Jart+ Ceramidin Cream scores 8.6/9.8 vs Peter Thomas Roth Water Drench Hyaluronic Cloud Cream at 8.1/9.8. Dr. Jart+ Ceramidin Cream wins for active ingredients.
Dr. Jart+ Ceramidin Cream edges ahead, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
15 unique
11 in common
14 unique
Where Dr. Jart+ Ceramidin Cream really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 5.4 compared to Peter Thomas Roth Water Drench Hyaluronic Cloud Cream's 2.9. Its formula features Ceramide Np, Ceramide Ap, and Ceramide Eop in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Ingredient Transparency is another area of separation. Dr. Jart+ Ceramidin Cream scores 8.8 here versus 8.5 for Peter Thomas Roth Water Drench Hyaluronic Cloud Cream. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Dr. Jart+ Ceramidin Cream brings Ceramide Np, Ceramide Ap, and Ceramide Eop as actives, while peter Thomas Roth Water Drench Hyaluronic Cloud Cream relies on Ceramide Np, Allantoin, and Tocopheryl Acetate. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Dr. Jart+ Ceramidin Cream is better if you have
Peter Thomas Roth Water Drench Hyaluronic Cloud Cream is better if you have
Both sit in the premium bracket, so value comes down to formulation quality. Dr. Jart+ Ceramidin Cream gets the nod here with its 8.6 overall score — you're getting more for a similar outlay.
Dr. Jart+ Ceramidin Cream edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but Peter Thomas Roth Water Drench Hyaluronic Cloud Cream is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, Dr. Jart+ Ceramidin Cream scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.