Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare Mini Alpha Beta® Extra Strength Daily Peel Pads vs INNBEAUTY PROJECT Elastic Skin Firming & Plumping Vegan Growth Factor Serum with Copper Peptides
Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare Mini Alpha Beta® Extra Strength Daily Peel Pads scores 9.1/9.8 and INNBEAUTY PROJECT Elastic Skin Firming & Plumping Vegan Growth Factor Serum with Copper Peptides scores 8.9/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
Head to head

Mini Alpha Beta® Extra Strength Daily Peel Pads

Elastic Skin Firming & Plumping Vegan Growth Factor Serum with Copper Peptides
Score comparison
These two are neck and neck — just 0.2 points apart.
Scores last verified: July 2026
Attribute battle
Hydration Efficacy
INNBEAUTY PROJECT WINSIrritation Risk
TIEActive Ingredient Strength
Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare WINSIngredient Transparency
INNBEAUTY PROJECT WINSFormulation Safety
TIEIngredient face-off
10% overlapOnly in Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare Mini Alpha Beta® Extra Strength Daily Peel Pads
34 unique
Only in INNBEAUTY PROJECT Elastic Skin Firming & Plumping Vegan Growth Factor Serum with Copper Peptides
43 unique
Why these two are neck and neck
These two exfoliants take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare Mini Alpha Beta® Extra Strength Daily Peel Pads scores 9.8 here versus 7.6 for INNBEAUTY PROJECT Elastic Skin Firming & Plumping Vegan Growth Factor Serum with Copper Peptides. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare Mini Alpha Beta® Extra Strength Daily Peel Pads brings Glycolic Acid, Hamamelis Virginiana (Witch Hazel) Water, and Salicylic Acid as actives, while iNNBEAUTY PROJECT Elastic Skin Firming & Plumping Vegan Growth Factor Serum with Copper Peptides relies on Dioscorea Villosa (Wild Yam) Root Extract, Ceramide Np, and Niacinamide. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Best for your skin type
Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare Mini Alpha Beta® Extra Strength Daily Peel Pads is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Targeting specific concerns like aging or uneven tone — Glycolic Acid does the heavy lifting
- Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations
INNBEAUTY PROJECT Elastic Skin Firming & Plumping Vegan Growth Factor Serum with Copper Peptides is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Butylene Glycol
- Targeting specific concerns like aging or uneven tone — Dioscorea Villosa (Wild Yam) Root Extract does the heavy lifting
Value comparison
Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare Mini Alpha Beta® Extra Strength Daily Peel Pads comes in at mid-range pricing with a 9.1 score, which is solid value at that tier.
Our verdict
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.


Frequently asked questions
Which is better: Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare Mini Alpha Beta® Extra Strength Daily Peel Pads or INNBEAUTY PROJECT Elastic Skin Firming & Plumping Vegan Growth Factor Serum with Copper Peptides?
Based on ingredient analysis, Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare Mini Alpha Beta® Extra Strength Daily Peel Pads scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Do Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare Mini Alpha Beta® Extra Strength Daily Peel Pads and INNBEAUTY PROJECT Elastic Skin Firming & Plumping Vegan Growth Factor Serum with Copper Peptides share ingredients?
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
What's the main difference between Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare Mini Alpha Beta® Extra Strength Daily Peel Pads and INNBEAUTY PROJECT Elastic Skin Firming & Plumping Vegan Growth Factor Serum with Copper Peptides?
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.