Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream vs numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence
Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream scores 9.8/9.8 vs numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence at 8.9/9.8. Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream wins for hydration.
Head to head
DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream
No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence
Score comparison
Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream edges ahead, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: July 2026
Attribute battle
Hydration Efficacy
numbuzin WINSIrritation Risk
TIEActive Ingredient Strength
Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare WINSIngredient Transparency
numbuzin WINSFormulation Safety
TIEIngredient face-off
33% overlapOnly in Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream
35 unique
Shared ingredients
25 in common
Only in numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence
51 unique
Why Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream comes out ahead
Where Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream really shines is hydration efficacy, scoring 8.8 compared to numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence's 9.8. With Glycerin, Sodium Hyaluronate, and Sodium Carboxymethyl Beta-Glucan in its top ingredients, Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream delivers stronger moisture-binding capability.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream scores 9.8 here versus 9.0 for numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream brings Ectoin, Palmitoyl Tripeptide-1, and Oligopeptide-2 as actives, while numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence relies on Niacinamide, Adenosine, and Tocopherol. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Best for your skin type
Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Glycerin
- Targeting specific concerns like aging or uneven tone — Ectoin does the heavy lifting
numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Glycerin
- Targeting specific concerns like aging or uneven tone — Niacinamide does the heavy lifting
Value comparison
At premium pricing with a score of 9.8, Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream delivers strong value. numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence sits at the mid-range level with a 8.9 score — the extra cost doesn't translate to better scores here.
Our verdict
Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence is still a solid pick.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream or numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence?
Based on ingredient analysis, Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Do Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream and numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence share ingredients?
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
What's the main difference between Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream and numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence?
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.