Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare Alpha Beta® Universal Daily Peel Pads vs numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence
numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence scores 8.9/9.8 vs Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare Alpha Beta® Universal Daily Peel Pads at 8.6/9.8. numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence wins for hydration.
Head to head
Alpha Beta® Universal Daily Peel Pads
No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence
Score comparison
numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence edges ahead, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: July 2026
Attribute battle
Hydration Efficacy
numbuzin WINSIrritation Risk
TIEActive Ingredient Strength
Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare WINSIngredient Transparency
numbuzin WINSFormulation Safety
TIEIngredient face-off
12% overlapOnly in Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare Alpha Beta® Universal Daily Peel Pads
27 unique
Shared ingredients
9 in common
Only in numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence
67 unique
Why numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence comes out ahead
Where numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence really shines is hydration efficacy, scoring 9.8 compared to Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare Alpha Beta® Universal Daily Peel Pads's 3.7. With Glycerin, Polyglycerin-3, and Butylene Glycol in its top ingredients, numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence delivers stronger moisture-binding capability.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare Alpha Beta® Universal Daily Peel Pads scores 9.8 here versus 9.0 for numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence brings Niacinamide, Adenosine, and Tocopherol as actives, while dr. Dennis Gross Skincare Alpha Beta® Universal Daily Peel Pads relies on Glycolic Acid, Hamamelis Virginiana (Witch Hazel) Water, and Salicylic Acid. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Best for your skin type
Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare Alpha Beta® Universal Daily Peel Pads is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Targeting specific concerns like aging or uneven tone — Glycolic Acid does the heavy lifting
- Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations
numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Glycerin
- Targeting specific concerns like aging or uneven tone — Niacinamide does the heavy lifting
Value comparison
numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence comes in at mid-range pricing with a 8.9 score, which is solid value at that tier.
Our verdict
numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare Alpha Beta® Universal Daily Peel Pads is still a solid pick.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare Alpha Beta® Universal Daily Peel Pads or numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence?
Based on ingredient analysis, numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Do Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare Alpha Beta® Universal Daily Peel Pads and numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence share ingredients?
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
What's the main difference between Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare Alpha Beta® Universal Daily Peel Pads and numbuzin No. 9 NAD Bio Lifting-sil Essence?
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.