Loading...
Dermalogica Dynamic Skin Recovery SPF 50 scores 8.5/9.8 vs Su:m37 Time Energy Moisturizing Soft Cream at 8.1/9.8. Dermalogica Dynamic Skin Recovery SPF 50 wins for hydration.
Dermalogica Dynamic Skin Recovery SPF 50 edges ahead, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
45 unique
9 in common
18 unique
Where Dermalogica Dynamic Skin Recovery SPF 50 really shines is hydration efficacy, scoring 9.8 compared to Su:m37 Time Energy Moisturizing Soft Cream's 8.4. With Butylene Glycol, Glycerin, and Sodium Hyaluronate in its top ingredients, Dermalogica Dynamic Skin Recovery SPF 50 delivers stronger moisture-binding capability.
Formulation Safety is another area of separation. Dermalogica Dynamic Skin Recovery SPF 50 scores 9.0 here versus 8.0 for Su:m37 Time Energy Moisturizing Soft Cream. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Dermalogica Dynamic Skin Recovery SPF 50 brings Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Extract, Citrus Medica Limonum Peel Extract, and Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract as actives, while su:m37 Time Energy Moisturizing Soft Cream relies on Bifida Ferment Lysate, Adenosine, and Niacinamide. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Dermalogica Dynamic Skin Recovery SPF 50 is better if you have
Su:m37 Time Energy Moisturizing Soft Cream is better if you have
At premium pricing with a score of 8.5, Dermalogica Dynamic Skin Recovery SPF 50 delivers strong value. Su:m37 Time Energy Moisturizing Soft Cream sits at the luxury level with a 8.1 score — the extra cost doesn't translate to better scores here.
Dermalogica Dynamic Skin Recovery SPF 50 edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but Su:m37 Time Energy Moisturizing Soft Cream is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, Dermalogica Dynamic Skin Recovery SPF 50 scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.