DAMDAM Matcha Boost Hydrating & Restorative Eye Serum vs Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream
Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream scores 9.8/9.8 vs DAMDAM Matcha Boost Hydrating & Restorative Eye Serum at 7.4/9.8. Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream wins for active ingredients.
Head to head
Matcha Boost Hydrating & Restorative Eye Serum
DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream
Score comparison
Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream takes this one, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: July 2026
Attribute battle
Hydration Efficacy
Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare WINSIrritation Risk
TIEActive Ingredient Strength
Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare WINSIngredient Transparency
DAMDAM WINSFormulation Safety
TIEIngredient face-off
10% overlapOnly in DAMDAM Matcha Boost Hydrating & Restorative Eye Serum
16 unique
Shared ingredients
6 in common
Only in Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream
54 unique
Why Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream comes out ahead
Where Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 9.8 compared to DAMDAM Matcha Boost Hydrating & Restorative Eye Serum's 3.5. Its formula features Ectoin, Palmitoyl Tripeptide-1, and Oligopeptide-2 in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream scores 8.8 here versus 6.9 for DAMDAM Matcha Boost Hydrating & Restorative Eye Serum. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream brings Ectoin, Palmitoyl Tripeptide-1, and Oligopeptide-2 as actives, while dAMDAM Matcha Boost Hydrating & Restorative Eye Serum relies on Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract, Salix Alba (Willow) Bark Extract, and Coffea Arabica (Coffee) Seed Extract. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Best for your skin type
DAMDAM Matcha Boost Hydrating & Restorative Eye Serum is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations
Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Glycerin
- Targeting specific concerns like aging or uneven tone — Ectoin does the heavy lifting
Value comparison
Both sit in the premium bracket, so value comes down to formulation quality. Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream gets the nod here with its 9.8 overall score — you're getting more for a similar outlay.
Our verdict
Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream wins this comparison with a meaningfully stronger ingredient profile and overall score.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: DAMDAM Matcha Boost Hydrating & Restorative Eye Serum or Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream?
Based on ingredient analysis, Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Do DAMDAM Matcha Boost Hydrating & Restorative Eye Serum and Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream share ingredients?
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
What's the main difference between DAMDAM Matcha Boost Hydrating & Restorative Eye Serum and Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare DermInfusions Fill + Repair Eye Cream?
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.