Loading...
CYKLAR Ceramide Milky Essence for Full-Body Hydration scores 9.4/9.8 vs rhode Glazing Milk Hydrating Ceramide Facial Essence at 7.6/9.8. CYKLAR Ceramide Milky Essence for Full-Body Hydration wins for active ingredients.
CYKLAR Ceramide Milky Essence for Full-Body Hydration takes this one, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: June 2026
34 unique
7 in common
30 unique
Where CYKLAR Ceramide Milky Essence for Full-Body Hydration really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 5.8 compared to rhode Glazing Milk Hydrating Ceramide Facial Essence's 6.3. Its formula features Ceramide Np, Lysine Hcl, and Arginine in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Formulation Safety is another area of separation. rhode Glazing Milk Hydrating Ceramide Facial Essence scores 9.0 here versus 8.5 for CYKLAR Ceramide Milky Essence for Full-Body Hydration. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
CYKLAR Ceramide Milky Essence for Full-Body Hydration brings Ceramide Np, Lysine Hcl, and Arginine as actives, while rhode Glazing Milk Hydrating Ceramide Facial Essence relies on Tocopheryl Acetate, Ceramide Np, and Ceramide Ap. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
CYKLAR Ceramide Milky Essence for Full-Body Hydration is better if you have
rhode Glazing Milk Hydrating Ceramide Facial Essence is better if you have
Both sit in the mid-range bracket, so value comes down to formulation quality. CYKLAR Ceramide Milky Essence for Full-Body Hydration gets the nod here with its 9.4 overall score — you're getting more for a similar outlay.
CYKLAR Ceramide Milky Essence for Full-Body Hydration wins this comparison with a meaningfully stronger ingredient profile and overall score.
Based on ingredient analysis, CYKLAR Ceramide Milky Essence for Full-Body Hydration scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
Honest skincare intel. No jargon, no gatekeeping — just the ingredients decoded.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.