Loading...
CYKLAR Ceramide Milky Essence for Full-Body Hydration scores 8.6/9.8 vs Glow Recipe Mini Watermelon Glow PHA + BHA Pore-Tight Toner at 6.8/9.8. CYKLAR Ceramide Milky Essence for Full-Body Hydration wins for hydration.
CYKLAR Ceramide Milky Essence for Full-Body Hydration takes this one, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: June 2026
40 unique
20 unique
Where CYKLAR Ceramide Milky Essence for Full-Body Hydration really shines is hydration efficacy, scoring 9.8 compared to Glow Recipe Mini Watermelon Glow PHA + BHA Pore-Tight Toner's 5.2. With Glycerin, Propanediol, and Hydroxyethyl Urea in its top ingredients, CYKLAR Ceramide Milky Essence for Full-Body Hydration delivers stronger moisture-binding capability.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. CYKLAR Ceramide Milky Essence for Full-Body Hydration scores 5.8 here versus 2.0 for Glow Recipe Mini Watermelon Glow PHA + BHA Pore-Tight Toner. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
CYKLAR Ceramide Milky Essence for Full-Body Hydration brings Ceramide Np, Lysine Hcl, and Arginine as actives, while glow Recipe Mini Watermelon Glow PHA + BHA Pore-Tight Toner relies on Opuntia Ficus-Indica Extract, Citrullus Lanatus (Watermelon) Fruit Extract, and Gluconolactone. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
CYKLAR Ceramide Milky Essence for Full-Body Hydration is better if you have
Glow Recipe Mini Watermelon Glow PHA + BHA Pore-Tight Toner is better if you have
Both sit in the mid-range bracket, so value comes down to formulation quality. CYKLAR Ceramide Milky Essence for Full-Body Hydration gets the nod here with its 8.6 overall score — you're getting more for a similar outlay.
CYKLAR Ceramide Milky Essence for Full-Body Hydration wins this comparison with a meaningfully stronger ingredient profile and overall score.
Based on ingredient analysis, CYKLAR Ceramide Milky Essence for Full-Body Hydration scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.