Loading...
Cocokind Ceramide Barrier Serum scores 8.0/9.8 and Tula Tula moisturiser +spf30 scores 8.0/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
These two are neck and neck — just 0.0 points apart.
Scores last verified: April 2026
19 unique
8 in common
These two serums take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Tula Tula moisturiser +spf30 scores 9.4 here versus 8.0 for Cocokind Ceramide Barrier Serum. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Cocokind Ceramide Barrier Serum brings Gluconolactone, Arginine, and Lactic Acid as actives, while tula Tula moisturiser +spf30 relies on Hedychium Coronarium Root Extract, Lactic Acid, and Cichorium Intybus (Chicory) Root Extract. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Cocokind Ceramide Barrier Serum is better if you have
Tula Tula moisturiser +spf30 is better if you have
Cocokind Ceramide Barrier Serum comes in at budget pricing with a 8.0 score, which is solid value at that tier.
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Based on ingredient analysis, Cocokind Ceramide Barrier Serum scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.