Loading...
Cocokind Ceramide Barrier Serum scores 8.0/9.8 and Elmiplant Skin Moisture scores 8.2/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
These two are neck and neck — just 0.2 points apart.
Scores last verified: April 2026
21 unique
38 unique
These two moisturisers take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. Cocokind Ceramide Barrier Serum scores 4.8 here versus 3.6 for Elmiplant Skin Moisture. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Elmiplant Skin Moisture brings Allantoin, Arginine, and Ascorbic Acid as actives, while cocokind Ceramide Barrier Serum relies on Gluconolactone, Arginine, and Lactic Acid. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Cocokind Ceramide Barrier Serum is better if you have
Elmiplant Skin Moisture is better if you have
Cocokind Ceramide Barrier Serum comes in at budget pricing with a 8.0 score, which is solid value at that tier.
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Based on ingredient analysis, Elmiplant Skin Moisture scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.