CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Serum with 1% Retinoid vs Kate Somerville KateCeuticals® SuperCell Rejuvenation Peptide Serum
CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Serum with 1% Retinoid scores 8.5/9.8 and Kate Somerville KateCeuticals® SuperCell Rejuvenation Peptide Serum scores 8.4/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
Head to head
Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Serum with 1% Retinoid
KateCeuticals® SuperCell Rejuvenation Peptide Serum
Score comparison
These two are neck and neck — just 0.1 points apart.
Scores last verified: July 2026
Attribute battle
Hydration Efficacy
CLINIQUE WINSIrritation Risk
TIEActive Ingredient Strength
CLINIQUE WINSIngredient Transparency
TIEFormulation Safety
TIEIngredient face-off
13% overlapOnly in CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Serum with 1% Retinoid
41 unique
Shared ingredients
6 in common
Only in Kate Somerville KateCeuticals® SuperCell Rejuvenation Peptide Serum
15 unique
Why these two are neck and neck
These two serums take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Serum with 1% Retinoid scores 7.2 here versus 5.0 for Kate Somerville KateCeuticals® SuperCell Rejuvenation Peptide Serum. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Serum with 1% Retinoid brings Ascorbyl Glucoside, Tocopheryl Acetate, and Hypnea Musciformis (Algae) Extract as actives, while kate Somerville KateCeuticals® SuperCell Rejuvenation Peptide Serum relies on Nicotiana Benthamiana Hexapeptide-40 Sh-Polypeptide-2, Zingiber Officinale (Ginger) Root Extract, and Bisabolol. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Best for your skin type
CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Serum with 1% Retinoid is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Dry or dehydrated skin that craves moisture, thanks to Butylene Glycol
- Targeting specific concerns like aging or uneven tone — Ascorbyl Glucoside does the heavy lifting
Kate Somerville KateCeuticals® SuperCell Rejuvenation Peptide Serum is better if you have
- Sensitive skin — the low-irritation formula keeps things gentle
- Anyone who prefers clean, well-vetted formulations
Value comparison
Both sit in the luxury bracket, so value comes down to formulation quality. CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Serum with 1% Retinoid gets the nod here with its 8.5 overall score — you're getting more for a similar outlay.
Our verdict
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Serum with 1% Retinoid or Kate Somerville KateCeuticals® SuperCell Rejuvenation Peptide Serum?
Based on ingredient analysis, CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Serum with 1% Retinoid scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Do CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Serum with 1% Retinoid and Kate Somerville KateCeuticals® SuperCell Rejuvenation Peptide Serum share ingredients?
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
What's the main difference between CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Serum with 1% Retinoid and Kate Somerville KateCeuticals® SuperCell Rejuvenation Peptide Serum?
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.