Loading...
Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel scores 9.4/9.8 vs CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Eye Cream with Peptides at 8.6/9.8. Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel wins for active ingredients.
Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel edges ahead, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: June 2026
51 unique
12 in common
Where Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 9.8 compared to CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Eye Cream with Peptides's 7.2. Its formula features Ceramide Np, Ceramide Ap, and Ceramide Eop in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel scores 9.8 here versus 8.8 for CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Eye Cream with Peptides. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel brings Ceramide Np, Ceramide Ap, and Ceramide Eop as actives, while cLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Eye Cream with Peptides relies on Hypnea Musciformis (Algae) Extract, Gelidiella Acerosa Extract, and Laminaria Digitata Extract. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Eye Cream with Peptides is better if you have
Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel is better if you have
Both sit in the premium bracket, so value comes down to formulation quality. Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel gets the nod here with its 9.4 overall score — you're getting more for a similar outlay.
Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Eye Cream with Peptides is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, Murad Nutrient-Charged Water Gel scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.