Loading...
CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Eye Cream with Peptides scores 8.6/9.8 vs Medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 at 8.2/9.8. CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Eye Cream with Peptides wins for hydration.
CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Eye Cream with Peptides edges ahead, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: June 2026
55 unique
8 in common
23 unique
Where CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Eye Cream with Peptides really shines is hydration efficacy, scoring 8.8 compared to Medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0's 7.4. With Glycerin, Neopentyl Glycol Diethylhexanoate, and Propanediol in its top ingredients, CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Eye Cream with Peptides delivers stronger moisture-binding capability.
Active Ingredient Strength is another area of separation. CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Eye Cream with Peptides scores 7.2 here versus 6.3 for Medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Eye Cream with Peptides brings Hypnea Musciformis (Algae) Extract, Gelidiella Acerosa Extract, and Laminaria Digitata Extract as actives, while medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 relies on Niacinamide, Allantoin, and Gluconolactone. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Eye Cream with Peptides is better if you have
Medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 is better if you have
At premium pricing with a score of 8.6, CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Eye Cream with Peptides delivers strong value. Medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 sits at the mid-range level with a 8.2 score — the extra cost doesn't translate to better scores here.
CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Eye Cream with Peptides edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but Medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Eye Cream with Peptides scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.