Loading...
CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Eye Cream with Peptides scores 8.6/9.8 and Laab MEN Multi-Booster Ultralekki krem nawilżająco-kojący scores 8.8/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
These two are neck and neck — just 0.2 points apart.
Scores last verified: June 2026
48 unique
15 in common
34 unique
These two moisturisers take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Laab MEN Multi-Booster Ultralekki krem nawilżająco-kojący scores 9.8 here versus 8.8 for CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Eye Cream with Peptides. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Laab MEN Multi-Booster Ultralekki krem nawilżająco-kojący brings Niacinamide, Acetyl Hexapeptide-8, and Pentapeptide-18 as actives, while cLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Eye Cream with Peptides relies on Hypnea Musciformis (Algae) Extract, Gelidiella Acerosa Extract, and Laminaria Digitata Extract. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Eye Cream with Peptides is better if you have
Laab MEN Multi-Booster Ultralekki krem nawilżająco-kojący is better if you have
CLINIQUE Smart Clinical Repair™ Wrinkle Correcting Anti-Aging Eye Cream with Peptides comes in at premium pricing with a 8.6 score, which is solid value at that tier.
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Based on ingredient analysis, Laab MEN Multi-Booster Ultralekki krem nawilżająco-kojący scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.