Loading...
Biodance Hydro Cera-nol Ampoule scores 8.6/9.8 vs Lubriderm Lubriderm Intense Skin Repair at 8.0/9.8. Biodance Hydro Cera-nol Ampoule wins for active ingredients.
Biodance Hydro Cera-nol Ampoule edges ahead, winning 1 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
29 unique
7 in common
19 unique
Where Biodance Hydro Cera-nol Ampoule really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 5.3 compared to Lubriderm Lubriderm Intense Skin Repair's 2.0. Its formula features Niacinamide, Adenosine, and Allantoin in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Biodance Hydro Cera-nol Ampoule brings Niacinamide, Adenosine, and Allantoin as actives, while lubriderm Lubriderm Intense Skin Repair relies on Tocopheryl Acetate and Copper Gluconate. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Biodance Hydro Cera-nol Ampoule is better if you have
Lubriderm Lubriderm Intense Skin Repair is better if you have
Biodance Hydro Cera-nol Ampoule edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but Lubriderm Lubriderm Intense Skin Repair is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, Biodance Hydro Cera-nol Ampoule scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.