Loading...
Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer scores 8.8/9.8 vs Biodance Biodance Collagen Peptide Eye Patch at 8.4/9.8. Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer wins for active ingredients.
Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer edges ahead, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: June 2026
23 unique
10 in common
60 unique
Where Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 9.8 compared to Biodance Biodance Collagen Peptide Eye Patch's 4.3. Its formula features Niacinamide, Acetyl Hexapeptide-1, and Acetyl Hexapeptide-8 in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer scores 9.8 here versus 7.6 for Biodance Biodance Collagen Peptide Eye Patch. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer brings Niacinamide, Acetyl Hexapeptide-1, and Acetyl Hexapeptide-8 as actives, while biodance Biodance Collagen Peptide Eye Patch relies on Niacinamide, Allantoin, and Adenosine. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Biodance Biodance Collagen Peptide Eye Patch is better if you have
Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer is better if you have
At mid-range pricing with a score of 8.4, Biodance Biodance Collagen Peptide Eye Patch is a decent pick. Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer sits at the premium level with a 8.8 score — the higher investment pays off in formulation quality.
Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but Biodance Biodance Collagen Peptide Eye Patch is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, Ole Henriksen Strength Trainer Peptide Boost Moisturizer scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
Honest skincare intel. No jargon, no gatekeeping — just the ingredients decoded.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.