Loading...
Biodance Biodance Collagen Peptide Eye Patch scores 8.4/9.8 and Medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 scores 8.4/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
These two are neck and neck — just 0.0 points apart.
Scores last verified: June 2026
23 unique
10 in common
21 unique
These two eye-cares take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Biodance Biodance Collagen Peptide Eye Patch brings Niacinamide, Allantoin, and Adenosine as actives, while medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 relies on Niacinamide, Allantoin, and Gluconolactone. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Biodance Biodance Collagen Peptide Eye Patch is better if you have
Medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 is better if you have
Both sit in the mid-range bracket, so value comes down to formulation quality. Biodance Biodance Collagen Peptide Eye Patch gets the nod here with its 8.4 overall score — you're getting more for a similar outlay.
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Based on ingredient analysis, Biodance Biodance Collagen Peptide Eye Patch scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
Honest skincare intel. No jargon, no gatekeeping — just the ingredients decoded.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.