Loading...
Anua Niacinamide 10% + TXA 4% Serum scores 8.8/9.8 and Biodance Hydro Cera-nol Ampoule scores 8.6/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
These two are neck and neck — just 0.2 points apart.
Scores last verified: April 2026
22 unique
17 in common
19 unique
These two serums take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Biodance Hydro Cera-nol Ampoule scores 9.8 here versus 8.4 for Anua Niacinamide 10% + TXA 4% Serum. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
Anua Niacinamide 10% + TXA 4% Serum brings Niacinamide, Tranexamic Acid, and Alpha-Arbutin as actives, while biodance Hydro Cera-nol Ampoule relies on Niacinamide, Adenosine, and Allantoin. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Anua Niacinamide 10% + TXA 4% Serum is better if you have
Biodance Hydro Cera-nol Ampoule is better if you have
Anua Niacinamide 10% + TXA 4% Serum comes in at budget pricing with a 8.8 score, which is solid value at that tier.
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Based on ingredient analysis, Anua Niacinamide 10% + TXA 4% Serum scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.