Loading...
La roche-posay Toleriane Double Repair Face Moisturizer scores 8.5/9.8 vs Amorepacific Moisture Bound Rejuvenating Creme at 8.1/9.8. La roche-posay Toleriane Double Repair Face Moisturizer wins for active ingredients.
La roche-posay Toleriane Double Repair Face Moisturizer edges ahead, winning 2 of 5 attributes.
Scores last verified: April 2026
35 unique
10 in common
19 unique
Where La roche-posay Toleriane Double Repair Face Moisturizer really shines is active ingredient strength, scoring 6.8 compared to Amorepacific Moisture Bound Rejuvenating Creme's 3.8. Its formula features Niacinamide, Ceramide Np, and Tocopherol in high positions, signalling meaningful concentrations.
Hydration Efficacy is another area of separation. Amorepacific Moisture Bound Rejuvenating Creme scores 9.8 here versus 8.5 for La roche-posay Toleriane Double Repair Face Moisturizer. That difference comes down to how each formula is built — the ingredient list tells the story.
La roche-posay Toleriane Double Repair Face Moisturizer brings Niacinamide, Ceramide Np, and Tocopherol as actives, while amorepacific Moisture Bound Rejuvenating Creme relies on Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract, Glycine Soja (Soybean) Seed Extract, and Nelumbo Nucifera Flower Extract. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Amorepacific Moisture Bound Rejuvenating Creme is better if you have
La roche-posay Toleriane Double Repair Face Moisturizer is better if you have
At luxury pricing with a score of 8.1, Amorepacific Moisture Bound Rejuvenating Creme is a decent pick. La roche-posay Toleriane Double Repair Face Moisturizer sits at the mid-range level with a 8.5 score — the higher investment pays off in formulation quality.
La roche-posay Toleriane Double Repair Face Moisturizer edges ahead with a slightly stronger formulation, but Amorepacific Moisture Bound Rejuvenating Creme is still a solid pick.
Based on ingredient analysis, La roche-posay Toleriane Double Repair Face Moisturizer scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.