Loading...
Aestura Atobarrier 365 Hydro Essence scores 8.4/9.8 and Laneige Cream Skin Cerapeptide Refiner scores 8.6/9.8 — a near-tie where your skin type decides the winner.
These two are neck and neck — just 0.2 points apart.
Scores last verified: April 2026
7 unique
14 in common
11 unique
These two moisturisers take different paths to a similar destination. Both formulas include solid hydrating ingredients, and the overall scores reflect that — the gap here is genuinely slim.
Laneige Cream Skin Cerapeptide Refiner brings Niacinamide, Ceramide Np, and Ceramide Ap as actives, while aestura Atobarrier 365 Hydro Essence relies on Niacinamide, Allantoin, and Adenosine. Both approaches have merit, but the positioning and supporting ingredients make the difference.
Aestura Atobarrier 365 Hydro Essence is better if you have
Laneige Cream Skin Cerapeptide Refiner is better if you have
Both sit in the mid-range bracket, so value comes down to formulation quality. Laneige Cream Skin Cerapeptide Refiner gets the nod here with its 8.6 overall score — you're getting more for a similar outlay.
It's a close call — both products score within 0.3 points of each other. Your choice depends on your specific skin concerns.
Based on ingredient analysis, Laneige Cream Skin Cerapeptide Refiner scores higher overall. See the full score breakdown above for details on each attribute.
Yes, they share common ingredients. Check the ingredient face-off section above for a detailed comparison.
The key differences are in their active ingredients and formulation approach. Check the attribute battle above for a detailed breakdown.
We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission from purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep Gracie free and independent.
© 2026 Gracie. All rights reserved. Data sourced from Open Beauty Facts (ODbL) and EU CosIng.